It’s quite long and not a...
It’s quite long and not a lot of places to sit or have a break.
He covered a lot of history, which was good.
Went over the time )too many details?) that quite frankly, lost the group.
Operator response
Hello Margaret
Thank you
Let me answer your claims
I am a confused
First this Is a WALKING tour I'm sorry there were not enough places to sit in your opinion but I cannot change the layout of public areas In the city , I do despite this make every effort to find a place to sit as you very well know but fail to mention for but ultimately you cannot come on a WALKING tour and complain about there not being places to sit and blame the guide??
Secondly though you seem to have developed amnesia and whilst complaining about this have completely forgotten that we actually STOPPED at a cafe for a break and drink half way through at MY suggestion and SAT DOWN for 45 minutes!!?
Why have you not mentioned this ??!!
Because it directly contradicts what you just complained about?
What more can I do??
We do this and you Fail to mention It and STILL complain about there not being enough places to sit down? Huh??
Some people just like to complain about something, anything it seems and have convenient memory loss concerning facts that totally contradict the complaint...
Thirdly, the tour went on for 3hrs 15 mins that day as a result of us taking a break
My tours usually last around 3hrs -3hrs15mins so considering I stopped the tour for 45 mins just so we could sit down I find this complaint just fictitious
I even say on Viator my tours can last between 3-3.5 hrs just to make sure we have flexibility so NO we did not go over time even though we also Included a 45 mins break, but ah, hold on you completely forgot about that ..
What makes this slightly mendacious even though is that I specifically ASKED you and everyone else after our break ( the one you forgot about?) what time people had to finish as I was aware this could mean us finishing closer to the 3.5 hr mark than 3hr and I wanted to make sure that was alright you said you IT WAS OK, as you had nothing specific after!!!
Yes you seem to have forgotten that too when complaining about "going over time and "loosing the group " apparently because of this ??
When "this" didn't even happen "?
Which leads me on to that point
No I did not "loose the group" not only because we did not actually go over time but because I didn't loose "the group"...
There were only you and 2 other people on the group tour and the other 2 even stayed and chatted longer after and told me they thoroughly enjoyed the tour , they even messaged me within 24hrs with their email so I could stay in touch and thanked me again
So "quite frankly" you are projecting assumptions onto people that are not correct just to construct a narrative...
In light of your amnesia and unreliable account of previous events....
EG complaining about not sitting down whilst "forgetting" we actively spent 45 mins "sitting down" half way through..
EG complaining about going over when we did not and I even checked with you about what finishing time was ok and you said it was fine...
Unfortunately this inability to remember these facts makes your claims seem unreliable and subject to a degree of amnesia that strongly suggests the veracity of them is highly questionable
I'm sorry about this
I don't enjoy having to point out these things, It's not like you gave me a bad review even, 4 stars , thank you but you just need reminding of the truth, I cannot allow people to just make stuff up that is blatantly false and then try to spin false narrative from that!?
I must say one thing I have learnt In the last 10 yrs or so is not to be shocked at the capacity and power of the human brain of people to selectively forget factual events and Invent fictitious scenarios they in the attempt to justify a narrative that they want to spin
Thanks
Unending knowledge of Paris History in WWII & beyond
The tour was excellent. We learned so much. Chris was like an encyclopedia of Paris history and could answer every question. Our granddaughter thought it was like being in a college class (in a good way).
US family tour
Our guide, Chris, was very knowledgeable about WW2 history in Paris. Great detail. Answered all of our questions.
Not a true walking tour
Chris was incredibly knowledgeable and friendly, and it's clear he has a genuine passion for WWII history. He shared a wealth of information and provided interesting historical context throughout the tour.
That said, we were disappointed that this was marketed as a walking tour, as the majority of the experience was spent standing in one place listening to explanations rather than actually walking to the sites being discussed.
In a few instances, locations being referenced, such as the Opera House, were well within walking distance, yet we remained stationary while Chris pointed them out in the distance. I should have been more diligent in reading previous reviews, as I was expecting a true walking tour rather than a series of lecture-style stops with only short walks in between.
One suggestion would be for Chris to invest in a tablet rather than carrying multiple folders filled with maps, photos, and printed quotes. A tablet would make it easier for guests to follow along and would create a more polished presentation.
Overall, Chris is extremely knowledgeable, but the pace of the tour felt slow and, at times, dragged on. If you're looking for an in-depth history lesson, you'll likely enjoy it. However, if you're expecting a more active walking tour that takes you from site to site, this may not be the experience you're looking for.
Operator response
Hello Marcy and anyine reading this
Thank you for your feedback
I was happy to be able to spend the time with you
"Chris was incredibly knowledgeable and friendly, and it's clear he has a genuine passion for WWII history. He shared a wealth of information and provided interesting historical context throughout the tour".
So considering this I musst have done something awful or very bizzare that to warrent only 2 stars and my tour not being a true walking tour , whatever thats Is ,last time I noticed we used our legs to get around and covered around 2 miles in total?
Considering the majority of people disagree with you and call my tour the highlight of their trip even and certainly consider It to be a "True walking tour"
I think the problem Is as a first time visitor to Paris with little or no knowledge of the occupation, or the size of the city this tour was NOT suitable for you depsite my honest efforts even to adapt It for you
You don't understand the subject at all firstly and what It takes to explain It so you are ableunderstand it properly and Instead saw It as like a sight seeing tour which It is not even though we do "see sights" of course They are secondary to the actual HISTORY and the people I talk about
So I could genuinely ask then what more do you want from a guide then than this ?
It doesn't seem that my lack of a tablet affected my ability to provide a wealth of Information ...Let me ket you Into secret as well
Tour guides do not bring tablets to enhance the experience of people on their tour
They do not enhance It
They bring them for their OWN coneinence to avoid having to carry folders of pictures wth them which are superior but of course take up more space and are heavier
I tried using a tablet years ago and found the experience far inferior to having actual full size photos and REAL copies if documents people can see and TOUCH in ALL kind of light and hold for themselves with no problems with aspect ratio or the need to zoom In as tbe tvabet screen is smaller
Yes they may LOOK "cooler" but trust me they are there purely for the conveiience of the GUIDE at the cost of an INFERIOR experinece for the people on the tour!
So I should actually be applauded maybe instead of criticised by someone who doesn't understand the Issue for putting my OWN convienience aside in favour of yours by bringing 8 folders of photos and documents , even though I do not use all of them on a tour , I bring them never the less just In case I get a question about something I want to show a visual for !
You had never been to Paris before so I think your complaint about not actually visiting the some of the places we talked about on a THREE HOUR walking needs some context and shows an ignorance of size the City and what Is practical on foot Its actually ridiculous to suggest we should hace walked to these places
I mean I have lived here 20 years but obviously you understood better the distance between certain landmarks and what is practical in 3 hours?
The ironic thing Is I actually changed the Intineary just for YOU because you said it was your first time
so I thought It would be nice If you could see some of the most famous monuments from a distance as Its not practical nor does it work for a WW2 Itinerary to walk to them all in a 3 hr tour and I could talk about them during the occupation
But apprently this was not In fact enough , you actualy DO think we should have WALKED TO THEM from where we were ??
Are you serious !
Besides the The Opera house which was walkable , thats true , It was a 15 min walk from where we began the tour but it would have taken us completely out of our way and why would we walk all the way up there for absolutely nothing? Its not mentioned as a place we may visit on the tour descrpition so I fail to understand your complaint , its misguided
I pointed It out and explained it was under renovation and the entire front was covered and had been for 18 months !
There was therefore absolutely nothing I could not tell you from where we were standing I showed you several photos of it during the occupation and explained its signficance
What more did you require? There Is nothing to see except a huge advertising board if we walk uo there ?
But now find out that you actualy wanted me to walk you and the other 2 people all the way up there and back, taking 30 mins total for what exactly?
Then as we walked through the Louvre and saw the Grand axis of Paris where we could see straight up to Concorde square then the Champs Elysee to the Arc de Triomphe a distance of over 2.5 MILES or a 50 min walk
I took the opportunity explain to you the history of the Arc and its significance during the occuppation but apparently you also complain we should have WALKED all the way there even though It was a FIFTY min walk and this was a WW2 tour NOT a general sighsteeing tour
We also saw the Tour Eiffel In the distance and I took the chance to again talk about Its significance during the occupation
But apparently you also use this to criticise me because again we should have walked THERE too another 50 min walk ???
Are you serious?
This is what you do on the BUS tour not a 3hr or so WW2 walking tour !
Never mind the other 2 more elderly people on the GROUP tour , one of whom needed to sit down??
Its a shame because actaully took you to this spot deliberately as it was your first time In Paris and i thought you would appreciatte that you could take in this wonderfull view on the Grand axis and I could also take the opportunity talk specificlly about these monuments during the occupation for you but apparently to quote you below ....
"the majority of the experience was spent standing in one place listening to explanations rather than actually walking to the sites being discussed."
This Is totally Is simply NOT TRUE and ludicrously out of context and disingenious to suggest
The MAJORITY of the tour , 3 hrs was NOT spent doing this at all, maybe 30 mins at MOST for THREE sites, thats 10 mis a site !
And the sites in question where the Opera house wich I have already discuseed Arc De Triomphe and Eiffel tower , which you are now complaining we didnt WALK to even though they were both 2.5-3 MILES away?
I have had some strange complaints over the years but I have never had this one before , NEVER had
First lets get things straight Instead of embelleshing the truth We didn't stand in ONE place , we stood In 3 different placesto doscuss each site seperatey
So you are seriously then complaining that we didn't WALK all the way to the Arc De Triomphe and the from there to the Eiffel tower but just stood in one and saw them from a distance?
Because these were the only places we
You'd never even been to Paris before but you know the layout better than me now and the practicality of getting around it??
And for Information after meeting we stopped at TEN different locations during the tour and talked about different subjects and finshed at place Vendome Yes TEN in total....
SO no we were not in ONE place all the time , that Is ludicrous I just took you to physically VIEW certain things from one place as a gesture that I thought woud be nice as It was your first trip as they are far to far away to walk to! Yet that Is used ludcirously as a criticism becasue we should have actually WALKED to them too !
I guess thats what you mean by a "true walking tour then!
Thats why its important to give the context of these sites you talk about us viewing from one place, and WHY we did this !
Its a WW2 WALKING tour and its made clear In the desription the AREA we walk around Its NOT a Private BUS tour
I better be careful then in future If I point out the TouR Eiffel in the distance as i could get critisicised for not actually walking all the way to it as well...
But this nonsense aside I do think you summed up one important thing quite well though
In essence folks .....
If you want a real In depth explanation of the Occupation and also real in depth answers to your questions and If you want to know the TRUTH , not just more of the myths and over simplified narratives you've been told then this tour IS for you As the many reviews from very happy people show
But understand this may take time sometimes and entail me having to explain things you have NEVER heard before
On the other hand If you DON'T really want this , If instead you don't want an In depth explantion of the subjects or me to actively encourage you to talk to me and ask questions and then take the time to properly answer your questions and Instead just move you on quickly with you leaving the tour having seen maybe a few more things , get some photos , got a few anecdotes but haveing not learnt that much you couldnt find on Wikipediea and certainy NOT having had long standing myths about the subject debunked and learnt the TRUTH the then this tour is NOT for you
I repeat this tour is not for people who dont want to Invest a little time in learning the truth
Or people who don't consider It a true walking tour they dont walk 50 mins between each site....
Its up to you to choose folks
Thats why I thank Marcy for actually giveing a fairly accurate description of what I am about and like as a guide as It allows me to CONTRAST this with the opposite
One of the problems that Is clearly arises Is some people misunderstand the nature of this subject that Its not just a simple walk around an with 5-10 mins of Information and the chance to take a photograph of buildings
Well we do this, we do walk and we do see buildings of course but also far more , I take the time to fully explain the history and how fits into the WIDER context
But because this subject Is not well known and a lot of what people do know Is either grossly over simplified or simply not true then as a teacher of history It is my repsonsibility and duty to not only take time to explain basic background Information to them but to also make clear to people what is the TRUTH and this can mean showing and rtlling people things they have never heard or understand before
And guess what, , again this can take time, especially at the beggining of the tour and If questions the arise from people that I also have to answer
Should I just skip this?
On this particular tour you were on there where other people who had been to Paris multiple times and were more well Informed and had a much deeper understanding and as a result asked me 2 or 3 questions that required some time to answer correctly
What should I do?
Ignore their questions?
Not answer them ?
Give them haf the truth ?
You though had never been to Paris before and had no knowledge of the city so prehaps a sightseeing tour may have been more suitable for you rather than one on such a complicated historical subject of which you had zero knowledge?
And what In fact Is a "True" walking tour if not a series of stops with lecture style Information given?
The amount of time between stops is irrelvant, the value if the tour is IN the quality of Information you are given not the distance between the stops The history of the occuoation toll place all over the City there Is no one place you can go to tell the whOle story in a few hours, It Is NOT like visiting a museum with everything laid out In nice chronological order .It would take me a week of taking you on tours to get near to doing this Likewise I cannot control the distance between buildings or sites to suit you As this Is a history tour not a sightseeing tour of tourist attractions then what does iT matter if the sites we vsist are all located within a 2 mile area?
Most people appreciatte that we can meet in an area where the locations are all within a short distance of each other and they don't have to walk 50 mins between each place ! ITe irony Is I am certain that If I did tha and understandably then I would be sure to have people complaining about walking too much
I really cannot win It feels sometimes ?
Again I think you shoud have just taken a sight seeing tour maybe Marcy?
And In terms of the tour being Marketed as a walking tour you wlil find that if you look in the tour description we did exactly what It says in terms of the area we visisted and the amount of walking we did !
So folks If you want a "true walking tour" better stay clear of me I wont make you walk 50 mins between sites ...
Also at the sites we visit I WILL explain thoroughly the importance of them in the social, political and military context of the occupation
I also wont pointlessly walk you 30 mins up and down an Avenue to see a building thats covered in advertising boards as Its being renovated so It waste of time
I also won't rush you on without answering your questions'
I also will make sure you I explain thouroughly the real reasons behind the German and Nazi Invasion of France and their plans for the country I will do this at the beggining and I will make sure yu understand this even thugh It may mean me having to debunk myths amd tgus may take time
I make no apologies for this as I have already explained that I see It as my job to tell you the truth and explain the complicated situation in France during this period rather than just reinforce simplistic untrue narratives
Its up to you !
Thanks
Great (but long) tour
Interesting tour and very knowledgeable guide. This guy knows his stuff and I learned a lot. Be prepared for a long tour but it was very informative!
Operator response
Thanks Meghan for your postive comments
I really apreciate your compliments about my knowledge and how much you learnt!
Thank you
And that you are also prepared to give your honest feedback on the tour length
I do state on Viator that it is usually between 3hr to 3.5 but I do have a limit of 3,5hrs because after this I feel both my own ability to teach physically and menatally starting to lag plus the abiity of people to take any more infirmation Inreachs overoad
Let me just note that for PRIVATE tours, not GROUP
I do run longer tours sometimes up to 4hrs but this will usually include us stopping for a drink of course and a chat
So It is neither a negative or a positve thing, It depends on the context and what I I am trying to achieve on the tour in those 3plus hours and what expectations the people taking It may have
I have had people turn up onsome occssions telling me they thought the tour was 2 hrs, or 2.5hrs so they obviously haven't read the information on Viator
So I now I always mention about this at the beggining so I know if anyone has to be finished by a certain time
But most importantaly Im glad you thought the tour was great
Hearing this makes me happy as my goal Is to educate people not just show them a list of sites and photo ops with 15 minutes of information you can find in a textbook or Wikipedeia!
Or to tell a few stories that just confirm simple cliches and tropes that many tours regurgitate
So let me be clear my tour is not a sight seeing tour where you just come to take photos and hear a few new stories that though they are Interesting and new still function just to confirm what you already believed or had been told before
My tours are meant to challenge peoples existing perspectives and streotypes whilst also also being a lesson In historyt
So usually my tours are between 3-3.5 hrs as stated on the Viator site however this Is not a fixed length,
I have some tours that do last less than 3 hrs and some that have lasted longer
Let me be clear though , I will never force this on people as so many of my previous guests can testify , I leave open the option of going longer than 3 hrs depending on the level of Interest and crucially the type and depth of questions I am being asked on that tour
And I I do tend to get asked lots of questions as well that are not always directly related to the subject I am currently explaining
I am in a way a victim of my own knowledge and desire to teach the truth and provide new and different perspectives because when people start to realise that a lot of what they thought was true or had been told Is not the they then become very eager to ask me questions about all sorts of subjects related to the occupation even though I may not the time be talking about them, Whicj is great BUT It does take time to answer them properly and thats one reason I have to have some flexibility in tour length
Of course this Is kind of Unique but necessary if I am to achieve my aim
So I leave some flexibility unlike many other shorter tours with SET times where everything can be rushed a bit to try to keep within a set time limit
I don't do that because my aim Is not to complete a tour as part of a business where people on It are just another group of nubers and take peoples money for It them tick It off but Instead to educate them
Amd I wont be satisfied unless people have gone away with their questions answered and having learnt the truth
As a result on short 2hr tours people do not have things properly explained to them, Its Impossible assumimg the guide even has the depth of knowledge to do so and do not have the chance to really ask questions and have them answered fully
On my tours it is different
And we can always go to bar or cafe to get a drink and chat too which I something I do quite often with people
So my tours certainly may not be for some people they do go into subjects in far more depth than the 2hr photo op tours and people get to ask questions and have them answered properly
I also send my guests a lot of additional after . a book list , a google map of the area we walked in with sites marked and Information I have provided plus links to interesting media information
Best wishes
Chris
Extremely knowledgeable...
Extremely knowledgeable and enthusiastic about the topic. We learned a lot about the war and the French experience during that time.
This tour was a highlight...
This tour was a highlight of our visit to Paris! We thought we knew a lot about Paris during WWII but the depth of his knowledge was amazing! We learned about the “back story “ between the French (and the French Police) and the Nazis, their relationship and what happened between them. I feel we heard so much that we wouldn’t have been able to read about. I am obsessed with Paris in the 1940’s and the tour really put a framework around the history of our family who lived here - and left- at that time. The tour is excellent for people who are interested in that time period!
Operator response
Thank you so much Drue
It was a pleasure to spend the time with you from start to begginng and I really appreciatte you taking the time to leave this review as well
Only around a 3rd of people who tell me they loved the tour end up leaving a review , whereas unfortunatiely 100% of the small minoriity of people who do not waste zero time jumping In here to leave a negtive review and cast untruths which can be disheartening
It shows how ludicrous these peoples comments can be to rationalise their own pride , .apparently everything I told one person could have easily been found In a texbook ,, yet you , someone with actual vast knowledge of the period and years of passion for its history who I know has read many many books says you learnt t so much you woudn't have been able to read about in a text book .... !!??
I am also not a large tour conpany and one anonymous guide out of dozens you coud be doing the tour with
I am a freelance expert guide so I do everything myself and put a lot of energy and effort into every single tour i do
I try to contact every person before so I know the name of EVRYONE on my tours and a little bit of backgroud infomation because I care to know
People on my tours are not a reservation number or bar code on a reservation paper to me ,I like to know who they are before and why they want to take the tour
I was really Impressed with your knowledge and passion for this subject and eagenrness to learn the TRUE story
As I said at the beggining my aim is not to please people on the tour with a simplisitc good guy/ bad guy story though there were plenty of them ....
.I'm not there to just tell them some more stories that simply confirm and add to what they already thought they knew and then showing them some buildings just for photo ops
No my aim is to increase peoples UNDERSTANDING of what REALLY happened and WHY things happened
And this means challenging the long standing and highly pervasive but simplistic and totally Incomplete and unbalanced narratuves that people were taught or hold
And this Is NOT for everyone
I see people who run 2hr tours and claim not only to tell the story of the occupation but to answer peoples questions about a whole range of subjects !
Trust me they are not It Is IMPOSSIBLE In 2hrs All they are doing is giving people a superficial story that goes along with the simplistic and unbalanced narrative people already had going into the tour about the NAZIS in Paris, the Resistance and the Shoah
They just give people MORE of the SAME and people go away feeling good because it always does to have your pr- existing views reinforced by additional new examples and information
I do the OPPOSITE my aim if needed which It nearly always Is is to DECONSTUCT the siimplistoic narrtaives many people have been sold and told and the reconstruct It brick by brick with the truth
And this Is not for everyone , as It requires people to think and CHANGE the way they saw things which can be unconfortable at the same time as It us fascinating IF you are open to learning
If your reading this and just want to hear more of the same of what you read in your Faction books and get some photos of buildings then my tour Is not for you
And yes I know this Is why I do get these occosianal wildly out if sync negtive reveiwslike t I received earlier this week
I do expect them from time to time and I understand if my tour was not for everyone but they still hurt becasue they always seem to follow the exact same pattern where they just have to go beyond and start misrepresenting what occurred then sadly often end upeven lying
So thank you so much just for having an open mind, an open heart and an eagerness and with It humility to learn even though you did have a lot of knowledge about this period yourself
It was a pleasure and I am glad I can stay Im touch and send you more information directly as we discussed
Best wishes and stay cool!
Paris during the German Occupation: A Unique Perspective
Chris's knowledge of the history of the German Occupation was encyclopedic matched only by his enthusiasm for presenting the material. He went beyond the scope of what we anticipated and his presentation was endlessly informative and entertaining. We would recommend this guide and this tour to anyone interested in this subject. Absolutely excellent!
John and Beth
The guide gave us a...
The guide gave us a lecture for 2 hours+ rather than a walking tour with information. . His information was not concentrated on the topic at hand until we spoke up. He obviously knows a lot but we did not benefit from his knowledge.
Operator response
Thanks for the 3 stars
Its better than 1
But what a totally weird and untrue account and once again someone Is manipulating the facts to cover up their OWN mistakes , misunderstanding and unfortunately arrogance
First :
Could you describe the 'topic at hand?"
The subject at "hand " was the Occupation of Paris ?
That's the title of the tour right ? Oh hold on , wait .....let's see what actually happened?
So I had began the tour by explaining why the area we were In was so Important as It was the centre of the German command of and occupation of Paris I then explained the entry of the German forces into Paris and the establishment of the first German Police and SS head quarters?
Correct?
And their priority In Paris ?
Correct?
And then division of France following the armistice a week later and why this happened in the way it did ?
Correct?
We then moved to another location where we could get a better look at the Paris Opera house which I was about to explain the significance and Its use ,why was it a such an Important building to the Germans during the occupation
How that helped us to understand the reason behind their occupation?
Correct?
So It is at this point you"spoke up "
But not in the way you are trying to present It...
Let's tell the truth...
You spoke up to say quote
"Isn't this a tour on the Resistance in Paris "?
To which I replied ,no that's not the title of the tour , Its called the occupation of Paris so it's about the ENTIRE occupation of the city Check ?
At this point you grimaced and furiously scrolled through your phone to check and then went quiet when you realised I was correct!
And you were wrong
Ouch
Forgot to mention this "little" detail above didn't you when writing about your "speaking up"? and why?
You found that hard to swallow and got a little bee under your bonnet
Now next please explain how talking about the German entry into the City , the setting up of their Headquarters, the arrival of the SS and Gestapo and then the Importance of one of the most significant buildings nearby to where were to them during the occupation on a tour about
"THE OCCUPATION OF PARIS" Is NOT " CONCNTRATED ON THE TOPIC AT HAND IE
"THE OCCUPATION OF PARIS "!???
Care to explain?
Because I have no idea what your on about unless maybe of course in YOUR head you were struggling to come to terms with the fact you were wrong about the title of the tour and therefore the emphasis of the subject matter?
I had spoken about ALL this BEFORE you "spoke up" ( and found out you were wrong a about the tour title ) yet apparently it all had nothing to do with the Occupation of Paris and it was only AFTER you "Spoke up" ,that this changed ?!!
???
What is even MORE Ironic in you saying this is the following nugget that has also evaded your memory...
Whilst I was attempting to talk about the "topic at hand " IE the occupation of Paris but wasn't apparently ,YOU were speaking over me to another person who had asked a question about a TV series they should watch about events that took place OUTSIDE of Paris ( certainly NOT the topic at hand ?) and continued to have these off topic at hand conversations THROUGHOUT the tour !
So you accuse me of giving Information that was not on the topic to hand , the OCCUPATION of PARIS whilst actually thinking you were on a DIFFERENT tour only to find out you were wrong and then continued to talk over and under me whilst I tried to talk about the topic at hand , the OCCUPATION of PARIS about things that had nothing at all to do with the OCCUPATION of PARIS or the actual "topic at hand ".....!
Is this a joke?
Look
You made a point of telling me you worked In Tourism and emphasized your own "knowledge" ....
And it felt straight from the beginning at that you were there more trying to judge me or catch me out rather than learn or listen to what I was saying talking over me ,and showing other people that YOU actually knew better when you didn't
So I don't know what type of tour you expected , after all you openly had to accept you thought you were on a different tour then accuse me of not talking about the actual subject the tour WAS about!
With your background and "knowledge" this seems It might have been hard to accept so you then psychologically rationalise your own mistake because of your own pride by projecting it on to me as the culprit and cause by ME not taking about the 'topic hand "...
Honestly one thing I have learnt over the years from meeting certain people on tours who are disgruntled after Is It is in reality because they have made a mistake and didn't read the tour information correctly or have come along and projected their OWN Idea of what THEY think the tour SHOULD be about or they just don't Intellectually understand nuances or complex interactions make up this history and just want a photo op tour with a few stories about stereotypes but no actual critical historical analysis
And instead of accepting this they try to blame me
And I have seen the infinite capacity of these people to rationalise and embellish the truth and leave out conveniently little things that don't fit their narrative and and lose them credibility when they go about blaming me in their "review"
Its depressing and as someone who puts so much effort into my tours Into going beyond simple narratives to tell people the TRUTH which IS complicated at times and DOES take time I feel really rock bottom
So to finish and I say this 100% honestly..
You obviously know a lot but the tour did not benefit from your knowledge
It felt the opposite
After you left the tour carried on another 90 mins and honestly the atmosphere changed completely , a cloud lifted and we had a great time
I'm sorry to say this but it's true